Search

Erik Myers (Valero)

These series of questions overlap quite a bit. The following answers address each question in the approximate order of those questions.

Our sites vary in the type of testing with most sites testing for combined (organic) fluorides in at least the propane and butane streams. Multiple stream points are typically tested dependent on what the monitoring goals are. Typical levels upstream of any treating are:

• Propane - 200 ppm

• Butane – 600 - 1000 ppm

• Alkylate – less than 100 ppm

Combined fluorides measured upstream of treating can be used as an indication of the completeness of the alkylation reaction. There will always be some level with the typical values noted above. Higher levels indicate potential issues with the upstream operation. The above values are for typical operations. Key contributors to increases in combined fluorides are low acid strength (below 85%), low reactor temperature (less than 80 o F), decreased contact time and low I:O ratio. Any of these can lead to increases in the amounts of all levels of combined fluorides. Propyl and butyl fluoride can increase by orders of magnitude with low acid strength. Post treatment levels of combined fluorides should be well under 10 ppm, typically.

Defluorinators are typically installed on the propane and butane streams, followed by KOH treating. These systems are occasionally used on the alkylate product stream. Water and HF are the products of the defluorination reaction. HF reacts with the defluorinator alumina to make aluminum fluoride trapped as part of the defluorinator alumina. This leads to potential of trace HF in the defluorinated stream if the remaining active alumina does not convert the HF. There is typically a lead – lag arrangement on the defluorinators to allow continued treating of the product streams. The downstream KOH treater is installed to dry the defluorinated product and remove any trace HF. It is less common to have a lead – lag for the KOH treaters but two of our sites have this arrangement on at least one stream. Some of our sites have water collection pots upstream of the KOH treaters to lessen the load of those treaters. To measure the effectiveness of the defluorinators and as an aide in determining optimum change out frequency, the streams are ideally measured before, between and after the treaters (with the downstream measured after KOH treating). The sample between the lead and lag defluorinators is used for confirmation of whether an alumina changeout is required. The upstream sample, along with the product flow rates can be used a predictive tool in scheduling lead defluorinator changeouts. The spent alumina can also be sampled and analyzed by the alumina supplier and compared to these predictive results for further alumina changeout optimization as well as verification of the hydrocarbon stream fluoride testing. One site uses a typical fluoride concentration and then a throughput totalizer to determine changeout timing, then analyzing the spent alumina to confirm loading.

Aside from the trace HF noted from the defluorination reaction free HF should not exist in the alky propane if the HF Stripper has adequate reflux and never show up in the normal butane or alkylate product. The primary cause for free HF is spent alumina in the defluorinators or severe loss of tower temperature profile in the alkylation fractionation tower(s). less than 1 ppm. Only one of our sites typically checks for free HF with the values being less than 5 ppm.

The KOH treater is typically a walnut bed downstream of the defluorinators. Our sites utilize both walnut and flake KOH, with walnut being typical. Our units are split with 50% have upflow and the other half downflow. This is typically an indication of the original unit licensor design. As noted earlier, water and HF are the products of the defluorinator. If the there is an HF breakthrough to the KOH treaters, it is most likely due to a spent defluorinator, where there is no more alumina to react with the HF. Significant breakthrough is important to avoid. Large amounts of free HF can cause the KOH treater to heat up resulting in hydrocarbon vaporization and unfavorable conditions for HF removal. (In a propane KOH treater, melting of the KOH and then freezing it in the outlet piping has actually been observed). One of our sites has an emergency alarm for high butane KOH treater outlet and delta temperature with another site having an SIS diversion for high C3 KOH treater temperature. The noted upstream and downstream sampling of each defluorinator is a key to staying on top of this processing area of the alky.

If KOH is still present in the treater while HF is measured in the product it is most likely caused by poor distribution through the KOH bed, either from channeling or crusting on the top of the KOH bed, sometimes caused by low amounts of water in the feed to the KOH treater. This low water content prevents the removal of KF (formed by the reaction of the KOH and the HF) from the KOH treater. Our sites have utilized either routine steam or water injection to the KOH treaters to prevent this.

Circulating KOH (typically used in the acid relief system neutralization system) can, and typically is, regenerated in a batch mode. We are not aware of a method to regenerate the solid fixed bed units as the KOH is converted to water and drained from the system. Three of our sites have two KOH treaters (either in parallel or series), allowing monitoring and changeout to be accomplished without compromising product quality. Residual KOH / water from the KOH treater changeouts can be utilized for make up in the circulating KOH system noted above.

Only two of our sites presently utilize a caustic heal in the alkylate product tank. This has been utilized at other sites in the past. This was done either as a preventative measure or as a result of previous issues with tank bottom corrosion. It is a common recommendation from the licensor. If this method is used, the tank water draw should be monitored frequently to measure changes and prevent loss of protection. The mechanism for tank bottom corrosion is either HF breakthrough from slumping of the fractionators, an exchanger leaks that routes acid to the tank or water in the alkylate product tank that leads to hydrolysis of the combined fluorides in the alkylate to HF if the residence time in the tank is long enough. The noted monitoring of any water draws and then ensuring that there is not water is another preventative measure for this.

Brad Palmer (ConocoPhillips)

Typical organic fluoride levels in alkylation unit products, upstream of any post-treatment, have been reported as 40-60 ppm (Alkylate), 200-400 ppm (Butane), and 300-600 ppm (Propane). Inorganic fluorides are not typically measured. Defluorination and KOH treating will reduce propane and butane organic fluorides to 10 ppm or less. Inorganic fluorides will be less than 1 ppm after treatment. Thermal defluorination, occurring in the heater passes, can further reduce organic fluorides in alkylate. Maintaining the fractionator bottom temperature above 320°F will thermally defluorinate any organic fluorides in the tower bottom thereby minimizing organic fluorides in the alkylate.

Un-used KOH material at breakthrough signifies bed channeling and/or a very dry system that allows KF to coat the KOH material. Defluorinator chemistry reacts organic fluorides with alumina to form alumina fluoride and water; an intermediate reaction product is HF, which may leave the defluorinator unreacted. The KOH treater is primarily a dehydrator and secondarily an HF neutralizer. As the KOH dries the LPG stream, the water "cleans" the KOH as it makes a sludge that is drained from the vessel. Any HF breakthrough from the defluorinator will react with the KOH to form KF and H2O. If there is very little organic fluoride to react in the defluorinator, there will not be much water formed to slough the KF off the KOH pellets. Some sites have used water injection to help "clean" and utilize the KOH material under dry conditions.

There is no effective way to regenerate solid KOH in the KOH treater with the vessel on-line. Water injection might be effective to refresh KOH that has been coated with KF as previously described.

It is a common practice to use an alkali heel in the alkylate storage tank. This is not for neutralizing HF, but is to counter-act iron fluoride scale leaving the process with alkylate which can form low pH hydrates on the tank bottom. The alkali heel should be tested routinely to ensure it remains basic.

Olivier Le-Coz (Axens)

More severe regulation in term of Benzene in the gasoline pool can lead to increase the Benzene content to the C5/C6 isomerization unit. This can happen in two different ways.

The refinery process operation can be modified to decrease the benzene precursors content in the heavy naphtha to the Reformer. This is achieved by increasing the light naphtha end point in the topping lights ends naphtha splitter, light naphtha being the Isom unit feed. At the same time C7+ in the Isom feed must be limited to 2 – 3 vol% as those products will undergo undesired hydrocracking reactions in the Isom reactors. With such a scheme, straight run naphtha Benzene (native Benzene) is basically treated in the Isom. This approach can typically be applied in the frame of a new project.

When the “pre-fractionation” scheme cannot be implemented or if it cannot allow reaching the overall pool Benzene specification, a “post-fractionation” option can be implemented. It consists in splitting the reformer product and recover a light Benzene rich reformate which will be treated in the Isom unit in blend with the light straight run naphtha. Depending on the Isom unit existing configuration, some modification to the hardware may be required or not. As a matter of fact, Benzene concentration at the Isom reactors inlet should better not exceed certain value to ensure proper operation and performances of the Isom catalyst (about 4 vol%).

-If the Isom unit is equipped with a recirculation, the recirculated stream acting as diluent may allow maintaining Benzene below the desirable value at the reactor inlet. The extra Benzene amount in the feed will be hydrotreated by the Isom catalyst without disturbing too much the operating conditions and without preventing suitable isomerization rate to be achieved.

-If the Benzene content at the inlet of the reactors cannot be maintained low enough (too low or no recirculation), a dedicated Benzene saturation reactor must be added.

In the case of new units implementation, those schemes have proved to work very well. In the case of revamp projects, existing equipment modifications or idle equipment reuse, a through basic design study upfront including the catalytic aspects is strongly recommended.

Brad Palmer (ConocoPhillips)

In general, refineries with C5/C6 Isomerization units or Aromatic Extraction units have increased feed rate and/or benzene content to these units. Reformer octane has gone down due to ethanol blending but, in most cases, Isom octane demand has remained strong. The primary successes include implementing these projects safely and achieving our benzene reduction requirements. Additionally, heavy reformate blend qualities have improved which has made blending premium gasoline easier and has provided additional opportunities for blend component sales.

A number of technology options were chosen by ConocoPhillips refineries to meet benzene regulations according to the existing configuration and site economics. These options include revamping Aromatic Extraction Units (AEUs) to increase feed and benzene production capacity, sending light reformate or heart cut to other AEUs, modifying C5/C6 Isom units to include benzene saturation reactors, new benzene saturation unit construction, reducing benzene production through prefractionation and use of credits.

All completed projects are working, some with very few operating problems and a few with requiring design modifications and/or operating changes. Operating, design and reliability issues continue to be worked to improve unit performance; a few specific examples are provided below.

Isomerization Unit Challenges

-When all benzene saturation reactors are complete, two will have Pt catalyst and four will have nickel catalyst. One of the reactors will have changed from Pt to Ni.

-The units that added a benzene saturation reactor in front of their Isom reactors have had challenges controlling temperatures profiles of all three reactors especially when liquid recycle is added or removed.

-Isom units have heavier feeds (increased X-Factor). One unit has and XF of 30 lv% average (35 lv% highest) and 9 lv% Benzene Average (10 lv% highest). Another unit has an XF of 25 lv% average (27 lv% highest) and 5 lv% Benzene Average (10 lv% highest).

-Determining when and how much liquid recycle is necessary for safe operation while maximizing fresh feed throughput has taken time. Vendors advertise an upper benzene level of 5 lv% to the inlet of a benzene saturation reactor. While we have gone a little higher by lowering the inlet temperature to accommodate the exotherm, this is a good rule of thumb.

-Increased unit rate can impact dryer operation by fluffing up-flow desiccant beds. Higher rates increase HCl loading to existing caustic scrubbers; less than adequate neutralization can lead to corrosion problems.

-Benzene saturation catalyst has been deactivated or poisoned by feed (organic sulfur, H2S, FeS, Chlorides) or hydrogen purity (CO and CO2) problems.

Aromatic Extraction Unit Challenges

- Changes in feed quality have required operations to find new equilibrium; one unit has reported bigger swings in aromatic content with new feed streams.

- Stripper foaming has occurred in one unit.

Ujjal Roy (Indian Oil Corporation)

In India, the benzene specification in gasoline is 1 vol.% max. In order to meet this specification, number of changes in the refinery configurations have been done. (a) Light Naphtha splitter has been introduced to produce C-5 & C-6 isomerization feed. (b) Naphtha splitter modified to reduce Benzene precursor from Reformer feed Naphtha. (c) Reformate splitter has been installed to separate Benzene from the Reformate. Over and above FCC gasoline being a component of Gasoline, for reduction of Benzene, a FCC gasoline splitter has been put to take away the Benzene rich cut called Heart Cut from Gasoline. For meeting benzene regulation in the Gasoline, Isomerisation unit has been designed with catalysts having dual functions – Isomerisation and complete saturation of Benzene. The metal sites are used for saturation of benzene and acid sites are used for isomerisation of C-5/C-6. Up to 9.8 vol.% benzene in feed, catalyst is able to saturate to nil level of benzene in isomerate.

Erik Myers (Valero)

The Valero approach has been to consolidate the benzene rich streams from various refineries and capture benzene as a product stream. This has been accomplished through use of a side draw stream from the reformate splitters and then feeding these streams through a centralized benzene extraction unit.

Olivier Le-Coz (Axens)

The countermeasures to pressure drop build-up in naphtha hydrotreaters units obviously depend on the cause of the fouling. The two main causes that we know in Naphtha HDT units of are corrosion particles usually coming from outside the battery limit and gums or coke. Axens addresses those two issues at design stage.

Corrosion particles are a potential problem and we indeed address that by implementing both feed filters and grading beds. Feed filters are specified as mechanical filtration devices, usually using metallic cartridges. We don’t have experience with magnetic filters.

As regards grading, Axens uses in its new unit's design or in catalyst replacement loading diagrams a wide range of products from inactive and high void fraction materials to lower void fraction and active products which can also address the removal of specific contaminants. Grading materials have proven to be efficient against particles in many cases. Grading arrangement can be studied on case-by-case basis and when relevant. Axens can propose arrangements of newer generation high void fractions and various pore size materials called CatTrap.

The gums and coke is a problem with units treating olefin and especially diolefins rich feeds from FCC or Coker Naphtha. The important considerations when designing a unit to treat such feedstocks are:

- avoid storing these materials but treat them directly from fractionation columns.

- foresee the injection of an antioxidant chemical if storing cannot be avoided.

- avoid hot spots in the heating system that would cause diolefins to polymerize, optimize the feed preheating scheme to avoid the use of a fired heater, or to reach the full vaporization point ahead of the heater.

But the most efficient way to stay away from gums pressure drop issues is to implement a selective hydrotreating reactor upfront the main HDT reactor. At low temperature and using a dedicated selective hydrotreating catalyst this pre-treatment reactors eliminates the diolefins without giving them a chance to coke further downstream in the process in the heater or at the top of the main and more active HDS catalyst which operates at higher temperature. Axens has been successfully applying this philosophy in many Coker Naphtha and FCC Gasoline (PrimeG) units. We have successfully revamped diolefins rich Naphtha HDT units with addition of a selective pre-treatment reactor, achieving a dramatic decrease of the downstream equipment fouling rate.

Ujjal Roy (Indian Oil Corporation)

We have much naphtha hydrotreaters (NHT) in our ten refineries, some operate with total straight run naphtha and others with cracked gasoline varying from 10% to 40% in feed. In many of the hydrotreaters, we have experienced run length limitations due to high-pressure drop-in reactors or pre-heat circuits while the catalyst was still active for continued operation. Depending upon the basic design, source of feedstock and its composition, we have feed filters (magnetic or cartridge or candle) in all NHT along with graded bed in few of them.

In one of our NHT processing 40% FCC gasoline, we have both magnetic feed filter and graded bed. But even in this unit, we have experienced pressure drop problem in CFEs due to caustic carry over from up-stream FCC unit. In another unit, where we have added graded bed 3 years back in addition to cartridge filter in feed, we have observed increased run length after addition of graded bed. In another unit, in which we have basket and cartridge filters in series but no graded bed, we had to do three skimmings in four years’ operation. The feedstock for this unit is straight run naphtha comprising about 30% material transported from other refinery by tank wagon. We have, off late, replaced the transportation from tank wagon to pipeline and directionally there is improvement in pressure drop, perhaps due to reduction in oxygen and iron pick-up from tank wagon. In another unit, processing about 10% FCC gasoline, having both cartridge and magnetic filter but no graded bed, skimming had to be done five times in six years. The reasons for the high pressure drop as observed after opening of the reactor bed is found to be central hip created at catalyst top bed. This may be due to some design deficiency. In all our hydrotreaters where we are processing cracked gasoline, we directly route the gasoline to hydrotreater with provision of intermediate balancing tank. All these tanks are nitrogen blanketed. Also, in one of the refineries, we inject antioxidant stored in the tank.

General causes contributing to pressure drop in hydrotreaters are either iron scales or coke/polymers. Iron scales are carried with feed from up-stream equipment like tanks and piping. Magnetic and other filters would be helpful in arresting foulant coming from up-stream units and tanks. Coke and polymers come from CFEs and charge heaters. High olefin content in feed than design and dissolved oxygen picked up during storage will aggravate pressure drop. In some case, we have observed high sodium content in the crusts formed on top bed. The source of sodium is likely carry over from up-stream unit. We have taken additional operating measures in up-stream unit to arrest sodium carry over.

In many instances in hydrotreaters, we have observed spikes in Delta P after restart of compressor subsequent to its tripping. It is suggested by our licensor that this might be due to two phase flow at the start of the compressor carrying coke from CFEs and charge heater to reactor. To avoid two phase flow, they recommended to reduce reactor pressure considerably when starting the compressor and to increase the reactor pressure only when reactor attains 260°C and above.

Where we have coker naphtha in feed, in one of the hydrotreaters, multi-layer grading beds have been used. The selective hydrogenation upfront also acts as guard to hydrotreater.

Most of the pressure drop problems in hydrotreaters are unit specific and might have been overlooked in design stage. Preventive measures can only be determined through careful studying the problem over run length.

Brad Palmer (ConocoPhillips)

ConocoPhillips generally uses graded beds on all our hydrotreating units. Several units also have feed filters. The graded beds are usually adequate for all but the worst cases, in spite of precautions. We have experienced extreme cases of upstream corrosion that have forced us to occasionally skim reactors and clean preheat exchangers, in spite of precautions. The upstream problems were eventually corrected by alloy or chemicals, although we prefer to avoid too many chemicals in the naphtha feeds. The difficulty with iron sulfide in units is that the particles can be extremely small (< 1 micron), so filtration is not always effective. Filtration for the naphtha units is usually cartridge filters.

Another more frequent cause for fouling in our system is polymerization of cracked feed stocks. This is promoted by exposure of the feed (or any feed component) to oxygen in tankage but can also be caused by numerous other polymers initiating factors. Filtration is not often effective at removing the polymers, except for those gums already formed in tankage. Additional polymers form rapidly during preheat, downstream of any filtration. The polymers or gums will foul the preheat exchangers, fired heater and the reactors, if they make it that far. To manage polymers in a naphtha hydrotreater, we prefer to add antioxidant to the cracked stocks as they rundown to tankage and add anti-polymerants to stocks as they are feed to a unit. The chemicals help mitigate polymerization, but do not completely prevent it. We also make sure that the dry point of the feed is reached ahead of the fired charge heater to prevent polymer lay down in the heater, subsequent coking, and potential tube failure.

Erik Myers (Valero)

Valero uses the following key approaches:

1. Filter the feed

2. Aggressively use grading material as our naphtha hydrotreaters are not activity limited

3. Utilize mechanical solutions where they look to be effective, such as trash baskets or pressure drop reducing inlet trays.

A key operating area to focus on is avoiding two phase flow in the charge heater. Liquid in the charge heater can lead to coking which when thermally cycled will transfer this coke to the reactor. Similar transfers of iron scale can take place with upsets in any upstream fractionation towers or other equipment.

This topic was also covered in detail in last year’s Q&A (Gasoline question #35). I recommend referencing the transcripts from that review for more information.

At least one of our sites has had very good success with a chemical treatment program incorporating dispersant and antioxidant components to significantly extend the run length of the feed – effluent exchangers. Feed effluent exchanger fouling was also covered in depth as question #36 from the 2010 Q&A session. The 2010 answers for gasoline and FCC naphtha hydrotreating also provide good information on the impacts of olefins and feed gum and polymerization impacts.

Praveen Gunaseelan (Vantage Point Consulting)

As mercaptans are sulfur-bearing compounds, they are one among numerous target species for sulfur removal from naphtha or gasoline streams to meet reactor feed or finished product sulfur specifications. Streams that need to be aggressively treated to low sulfur levels, such as naphtha feed to catalytic reformers, or ultra-low-sulfur gasoline product or blend stock, often require hydrotreating, which targets removal of a broad array of contaminants, including mercaptans.

However, there are a number of instances that warrant targeted removal of mercaptans species from refinery naphtha and gasoline streams (generally achieved through mercaptans extraction or sweetening). Some examples are provided below.

For light gasolines with a high proportion of mercaptans sulfur, selective extraction of mercaptans may be a competitive alternative to hydrotreating. For example, light straight run naphtha or FCC light naphtha with a high proportion of mercaptans sulfur may require only caustic extraction to be rendered acceptable as gasoline blendstock. In the case of FCC light naphtha, caustic treating for mercaptans can help avoid octane loss from olefin saturation during hydrotreating.

Light (C1-C6) mercaptans have an objectionable odor and corrosion potential and are prone to accumulate in refinery naphtha and lighter streams. In instances where naphtha is segregated, such as for use as a feedstock for downstream processing, there may be a need to reduce light mercaptans content to render the material transportable, regardless of the total sulfur content. In such instances, caustic sweetening of the naphtha may be appropriate, where the light mercaptans are oxidized to odorless disulfides.

Besides meeting sulfur specifications, gasoline streams may require meeting a mercaptans specification, such as a negative Doctor test. If the mercaptans specification is difficult to achieve through hydrotreating (for instance, due to recombinant mercaptans), mercaptans sweetening of the stream may be required.

Selective hydrotreating of FCC gasoline can result in the formation of recombinant heavy mercaptans due to the reaction of olefinic species with H2S. Depending on the sulfur level, these mercaptans may either have to be extracted (to meet the minimum sulfur specification) or sweetened to disulfide to render the gasoline acceptable as blendstock. Proprietary reagents are typically required in such instances.

For tank inventories or cargoes of gasoline or naphtha that are off-spec due to high mercaptans levels, mercaptans scavengers are typically used to treat the material to specification in a batch/semi-batch setting. Continuous treatment of liquid streams for scavengers is not typically performed because it is uneconomical compared to dedicated treatment processes.

Michael Windham (UOP)

Gasoline and naphtha streams if routed to gasoline pool should meet the following specs: Total S, mercaptan sulfur, Doctor test, CuStrip and Silver strip corrosion. If total sulfur is not required, Minalk Merox can be used to meet all of these specs. However, if total sulfur reduction is required, an extraction Merox should be used.

Of course, mild hydrotreating can also be used if reduction of sulfur is a must. However, for increased flexibility of the hydrotreating severity, a Minalk should be installed on its product.

Brad Palmer (ConocoPhillips)

Besides the obvious need to meet gasoline sulfur specifications, mercaptans tend to be malodorous and some tend to promote fuel instability by acting to aid initiation of gum formation by peroxidation. To deal with these situations, refiners can employ either mercaptan removal using strong caustic (extraction) or mercaptan oxidation that converts mercaptans in-situ to disulfides (sweetening).

Extraction is viable for the lowest molecular weight mercaptans. As the hydrocarbon chain containing the mercaptan group grows, the less water soluble the mercaptan becomes. Extraction efficiency drops off rapidly after ethyl mercaptan. Only lighter gasoline fractions will contain mainly methyl and ethyl mercaptans, (light cat or coker naphtha, C5-C7 paraffins). Heavier gasoline fractions will contain not only heavier mercaptans, but also other sulfur compounds that will neither be subject to caustic extraction nor sweetening.

Extraction can be done on a "once-through" or regenerative basis. Since extraction is equilibrium limited, once-through treating can become costly as only a small portion of the caustic value can be consumed before a significant breakthrough to the finished product occurs. Regenerative extraction processes such as UOP's Merox™ and Merichem's Thiolex™ allow the lightly loaded caustic to be reused. Distillation regeneration as well as oxidation regeneration is available, with oxidation being the most widely employed. However, distillation regeneration is not likely to be used in gasoline extraction as the extraction of heavier mercaptans will be limited by the residual methyl mercaptan content of the lean caustic from the regeneration.

Oxidative regeneration is accomplished using air and cobalt based oxidation catalyst to convert dissolved sodium mercaptide salts from the extraction into disulfide oils. The disulfide oils are nearly insoluble in the caustic and can be gravity separated from the regenerated caustic stream. Merox™ and Thiolex™ use variations of the contact, oxidation, and disulfide separation stages to accomplish extraction. Both technologies employ naphtha wash of the regenerated caustic to re-absorb trace disulfide oil that may be entrained in the lean caustic from the disulfide separation stage to prevent "re-entry" sulfur.

Sweetening is not an option for low sulfur gasolines as the mercaptan to disulfide conversion is done in-situ, that is, the sulfur content of the gasoline does not change. Sweetening can be used after extraction to aid in product stability and odor control.

Malcolm Sharpe (Merichem Company)

In the low-sulfur (< 10 wppm total S) gasoline world, there are potentially three (3) applications where wet treating can be utilized to remove mercaptans from FCC gasoline. Two of these solutions require that a FCC gasoline splitter be installed and the third removes mercaptans from selectively hydrotreated FCC gasoline.

In the case of splitter-derived FCC gasoline, the mercaptans can either, one, be extracted from the light FCC gasoline fraction using caustic-based FIBER FILM® technology (THIOLEXTM/REGEN®) or, two, be sweetened using caustic/catalyst/air-based FIBER FILM® technology (MERICATTM II) ahead of the gasoline splitter to convert the mercaptans contained in the light gasoline fraction into the heavier disulfide oil (DSO) molecule. This DSO leaves with the heavy FCC gasoline destined for the hydrotreater. The suitability of these applications is refinery-specific and is especially dependent on the light FCC gasoline cut-point and gasoline pool blending tolerances with respect to sulfur. The mercaptan extraction method (THIOLEXTM/REGEN®) can also be used to treat light straight-run naphtha subject to the same refinery-specific operating criteria.

Third, in some cases refiners may encounter recombinant mercaptan sulfur in selectively hydrotreated FCC gasoline. The presence of high levels of hydrogen sulfide and olefins at the outlet conditions of the selective reactor can lead to the formation of heavy molecular weight recombinant mercaptan compounds. Rather than increasing hydrotreater severity, at the expense of octane loss and hydrogen consumption, to battle this increase in product sulfur, it can be optimized using EXOMERTM technology which is designed to extract the recombinant mercaptans as they form. In this way operating expense and octane reduction are minimized while reaching target gasoline sulfur specifications.

Jeff Lewellen (HollyFrontier)

Our El Dorado facility has transitioned from a 950o F HVGO/VTB cut point coker feed to a +1075 F while maintaining a fairly constant feed rate to the delayed coker unit. Our experience has seen coke and off-gas yield increase while HCGO yield decreases.

Our Conclusions:

• Yields – VGO range material is a relatively small contributor to coke yield in the unit. Between meter error and coke yield estimates, we have been unsuccessful in quantifying the exact yield impact.

• Capacity - Depending upon unit constraints, additional VGO occupies feed volume in the unit that could be used as VTB/residuum feed.

• Energy – The major impact is increased heater firing due to energy required to vaporize the excess VGO. This may also increase required drum temperatures to achieve equivalent VCM% results.

• Coke quality - Additional VGO may act similar to adding internal recycle to the unit. Although generally not aromatic, it could shift coke from shot to sponge coke. However, this is much more crude composition, drum velocity/pressure dependent.

Rajkumar Ghosh (Indian Oil Corporation)

Excess VGO in Coker feed is obviously not a desirable situation as it amounts to down gradation of straight run product. In one of our old refineries, we run a small Coker with long residue (RCO) as feed. Based on the experience there, the Impact of excess VGO in feed on Coker operation is explained as below:

a. Yield: The VGO part in the feed will have a free ride to the fractionator, thereby numerically reflecting higher distillate on Coker feed and consequent reduction in coke make. However, increase in coke drum vapor velocity will force higher pressure operation to prevent foam-over, leading to higher coke make from the residue part of the feed to the unit. The extent of increase in pressure will be dictated by the amount of VGO in feed.

b. Capacity: In the VR only case operation, if the feed to Coker is limited by Coke drum Capacities, then we certainly have a case for processing higher throughput in the excess VGO case, due to lower overall coke make. However, in such a case, Coke drum vapor velocity will also have to be cross checked and be maintained within the safe limit of 0.5 ft/sec. With lighter feed to Coker, the extent of vaporization in the heater tubes will be higher, leading to higher pressure drop across the heater. Heater duty will increase and may impose capacity limitations. Further, HCGO section flooding in the fractionator, HCGO product and pumparound circuit limitations may also become reasons for capacity bottleneck.

c. Energy: Excess VGO in feed will require higher heater duty. This may impose heater limitation with consequent lower COT. Lowering recycle under such a situation may help. However, it may result in higher HCGO CCR due to inadequate internal reflux in the wash zone. If HCGO circuit is not limiting, some of the heat can be recovered back into feed due to higher HCGO make.

d. Coke Quality: With the reduced wt% of asphaltenes, resins and metals in the feed, the coke quality will tend to improve. All the green coke produced with RCO feed is expected to be sponge coke with moderate VCM. Depending on the feed Sulfur content, the coke can be graded into Anode grade.

Eberhard Lucke (Commonwealth E&C)

Delayed Cokers are built to process residue, not gasoil. Excess VGO in the coker feed will only replace residue in the feed and will cause downgrading of almost all VGO to HCGO. HCGO yields will increase accordingly. The charge heater may benefit slightly from increased vaporization and lower fouling rates in the tubes. The coke may see an increase in VCM and may get a little softer, but this can be compensated by correct steam stripping.

Gary Gianzon (Marathon Petroleum Company)

When one of MPC’s refineries starts processing heavy Canadian resid, they add 5 to 10 volume percent of slurry oil in the feed to mitigate making shot coke. The slurry also helps meet anode grade specifications on metals and sulfur. Processing slurry backs out resid processing which can impact unit economics.

FCCU slurry has a similar boiling range to heavy coker gasoil, so a large amount of slurry flashes out of the drum and ends up in the heavy coker gasoil product. The coke yield from slurry feed is around 2 to 3 x Concarbon (depending on coker unit operation) which is significantly higher than vacuum resid at 1.3 to 1.6 x Concarbon. If a high percentage (over 10 percent) of slurry is processed in the coker unit, the slurry can cycle up between the coker and FCCU unit. The amount of recycle built-up is somewhat self-correcting depending on operations in the coker and FCC and whether the HCGO is processed in a FCCU Feed Hydroteater.

Rajkumar Ghosh (Indian Oil Corporation)

We are adding approx. 3–4 wt% FCC Slurry oil in Coker feed in one of our Coker and about 10 wt% in another. We also had undertaken a study in the Delayed Coker pilot plant in our R&D centre. Our experiences with processing of FCC slurry oil in the Coker feed, based on field and pilot plant results, are as under:

a) Yield: The impact of slurry oil in Coker feed depends upon the quality of the base feedstock, CLO/slurry oil and also the pressure / temperature of the coke drums. If FCC slurry oil boiling point distribution and the coke drum pressure / temperature are such that most of the slurry oil vaporizes out of the coke drum, yield of coke and gas reduces with increase in distillate yield.

    In case of Fuel grade Coker, with CLO (with minimum overlap of LCO) below 10wt% in VR feed, coke yield by and large may be constant or may increase marginally depending on the relative quality of VR and CLO. Yields of total gas and liquid decrease marginally. Beyond 10 wt% (10-20 wt%) of CLO in VR feed, the coke yield may increase up to 4 wt%.

b) Capacity: The Coke produced with significant FCC slurry in Coker feed (>10 wt%) has a close-knit Coke matrix which ensures good porous structure to the Coke bed. This reduces the chances of hot spots and blowouts. But the negative impact of adding FCC slurry is pronounced where the coke drum is already limiting, as the porous structure results in lower coke bed bulk density and hence lesser vapor space in the Coke Drum. It may limit the Coker capacity.

c) Product quality: Tendency of formation of Shot coke significantly reduces with the addition of FCC slurry in the Coker feed, as it keeps asphaltenes in solution form. As per our experience at Panipat Coker, impact of slurry addition in the Coker feed is clearly visible on the Coke quality w.r.t. reduction in Shot coke formation. With increased FCC slurry in Coker feed, increase in Silica content in the green Coke would be a criterion to limit its wt% in the feed. This is significant for the Cokers producing Anode grade coke. Typical limit of Silica in Anode grade green Coke is 0.02 wt % max. Depending on the quality of the slurry oil and unit operating conditions, there may be a negative impact on the quality of the LCGO and HCGO. They will become more aromatics and heavier.

d) Energy: Slurry processing will require higher heater duty. High aromatic content in the slurry oil prevents the precipitation of Asphaltenes and thus increases the heater run length. Injection of slurry oil into the coke feed is limited by refinery configuration. In our Refineries with FCC and/or Hydrocracking units, we limit the slurry oil within 5 to 10 wt% on fresh feed to Coker. Increase in injection rate can lead to a massive recycle between the Coker and the FCC or will result in accelerated catalyst deactivation in the Hydrocracker unit.

Eberhard Lucke (Commonwealth E&C)

In general, FCC Slurry has a similar effect as VGO in terms that it replaces residue in the feed and increases mainly the HCGO yield. The difference in this case is that FCC Slurry is a highly aromatic stream and is often used as additional Coker feed (up to 15wt% max. recommended) to reduce heater fouling and to push coke morphology to sponge coke (for anode grade coke). The heavy aromatics in the FCC Slurry help keeping asphaltenes in solution a lot longer and promote coke formation by poly-condensation, therefore increasing sponge type coke content in the coke bed (preferred for low sulfur, anode grade coke production). On the downside, FCC Slurry will contain entrained catalyst fines and – if too high in concentration – may have a negative impact on fouling rates in the charge heater(s). The fine catalyst particles can deposit inside the heater tubes, act as seeds for coking and may promote deposits of heavy oil and coke fines from the oil film inside the tubes.

John Aikman (Grace Catalysts Technologies)

While there are several operational and mechanical factors that can influence a unit’s particulate emissions, the question asks specifically about the FCC catalyst; as such, the following discussion will address characteristics of fresh catalyst only.

There are four basic characteristics of FCC catalyst that can have direct effects on particulate emissions. These same characteristics will also affect particulate losses to the fractionator and slurry product. The first characteristic is simply the amount of fines content coming into the unit with the fresh catalyst due to the manufacturing process. Figure 1 is an example of a typical fresh catalyst particle size distribution, with a theoretical depiction of a cyclone’s ability to retain fresh catalyst particles. DPTh is the smallest particle diameter which can reliably be collected by a cyclone and is used to model cyclone performance. Particles below this size will be lost by the cyclone.

A review of the Grace Ecat database showed that none of the FCCU’s in North America can retain any 0-20 μ range particles. In addition, they only retain an average of approximately 4.0 wt% in the 0-40 μrange. Fresh catalyst typically ranges anywhere from 9 to 16% of 0-40 μ depending on the supplier andmanufacturing process. Some units require higher amounts of 0-40 μ range particles to help with circulation.

The next characteristic of fresh catalyst that must be considered is the particle density. he DPTh mentioned above will decrease with increased catalyst particle density, per Equation 1 below. This means that cyclones can retain smaller particle sizes as the particle density increases. This is due to the centrifugal force acting on a heavier particle.  However, particle density is not the same as apparent bulk density (ABD). Industry typically measures and reports ABD as part of the routine Ecat analysis, but this should not be mistaken for particle density for cyclone efficiency purposes. Since Al2O3 is denser than SiO2, catalysts with higher alumina content will have higher catalyst particle density.

The third characteristic is the inherent attrition resistance of the fresh catalyst. Industry measures the attrition resistance via a variety of tests, with the primary goal of providing a relative indication of catalyst attrition resistance. Grace utilizes the DI test or Davison Index. On the DI scale, a lower number is less likely to cause attrition and generate microfines. It is usually not valid to compare attrition resistance results obtained from different laboratories. Additionally, it is important to note that the energy applied to a catalyst sample during attrition testing is much more severe than commercial conditions.

As discussed above, the majority of the microfines created in the FCCU will leave the unit through either the reactor or regenerator cyclones, with the latter potentially contributing to increased particulate emissions at the stack.

'The attrition resistance of the catalyst is a function of the manufacturing process and the binder material utilized during the manufacturing process. Figure 2 is an example of how a refiner improved the FCCU stack opacity with catalyst formulation. The reduction was achieved changing to a Grace supplied catalyst with lower DI and lower 0-40  μ content in the fresh catalyst.

The final characteristic of fresh catalyst that affects particulate emissions is its morphology. Morphology can be defined as the study of the form and structure of a particle and its specific structural features. A catalyst particle that has a smoother exterior surface is less likely to generate microfines in an FCCU. Even catalysts with a low fresh DI measurement can cause increased particulate emissions if there are surface irregularities resulting from the manufacturing process. In order to demonstrate this visually, Figures 3 and 4 present SEM’s (scanning electron microscopy) of “bad” and “good” fresh catalyst morphology for a side-by-side comparison.

Figure 3 and 4 SEM’s of Fresh Catalyst (magnified X250)

“Bad Morphology” “Good Morphology” In conclusion, there are several characteristics of fresh catalyst that can be controlled to reduce particle losses and thereby reduce flue gas emissions. Specifically, to lower emissions the fresh FCCcatalyst should possess the following characteristics: a particle size distribution with an optimal range of 0-40 μ particles, higher catalyst particle density, lower DI, and superior morphology. Grace’s alumina-sol technology provides superior binding to the catalyst particle leading to best-in-industry attrition resistance. The versatility and performance of alumina-sol catalysts coupled with Grace’s manufacturing capability, have resulted in wide-market acceptance and as a result, Grace is the preferred FCC technology for loss sensitive units around the world.

Shankar Vaidyanathan (Flour)

Dry gas seals have been used for compressors for many years. The feedback was mixed in its infancy, and there were teething problems. External factors such as the contamination of the sealing gas, insufficient sealing gas pressure and process gas leak onto the seal ring surfaces have been the main reasons for seal degradation. Wetness, particulates, and heavier hydrocarbons cause seal reliability issues. The quality of seal gas and buffer gas, dryness level, pretreatment, liquid separation and filtering are the keys to reliable operation. Experience has shown that seals can last a long time in a clean environment and many existing plants have switched over to gas seals. Tandem self-acting dry gas seal with internal labyrinths has been selected in many recent projects.

Please see the attached sketch for external components of the dry gas seal system.

1. Depending on pressure balance, the sealing gas may be pure makeup hydrogen (if the makeup compressor is located within the same plot) or recycle compressor discharge gas. Chlorides in makeup hydrogen and amine aerosols in recycle hydrogen are potential contaminants.

2. Nitrogen is used as the buffer gas.

3. Filters for seal gas and buffer gas should be duplex, one operating and one standby, 3-micron stainless steel coalescing filters equipped with high differential pressure alarm. Avoid three-way valves for filter switching.

4. Consider additional pre-filter for sealing gas if experience has shown that coalescing filters are inadequate. Consider additional demister filter for buffer gas if necessary.

5. Minimum 1” size stainless steel piping is preferred. Additional notes for piping layout include minimizing runs, avoiding pockets, heat tracing and winterizing as necessary.

6. The seal gas injection is on automatic pressure control.

7. Primary vent is routed to flare; secondary vent is routed to safe atmospheric location.

8. Primary seal vent flow is monitored with high flow and high-pressure alarms.

9. Pressure in the secondary vent line must be limited such that the maximum seal backpressure should not exceed 5 psig.

10. Consider differential pressure alarm between the buffer gas and secondary vent.

Minh Dimas (CITGO)

Dry gas seals are more reliable than oil seals provided the seal gas conditioning system is properly designed, and the seal gas is very clean and dry. That said, the filtration and liquid removal system must be very reliable and have spare equipment to maintain its reliability. Tandem dry gas seals require a source of very clean, dry seal gas at startup.