Concurrent Subgroup Meetings
- Hazard ID/Practices Sharing
- Human Reliability
- Industry Learning & Outreach
- Mechanical Integrity
- Regional Network Chairs
- Site Assessments
- Walk the Line
General Session
Team Building Exercise
Terrace on 5th Floor of Grand Hyatt.
Cocktail Reception
Process Safety Advisory Group Recognition & Dinner
Process Safety Advisory Group Meeting
Pursuing Circularity – The Current State of Advanced Recycling and the Opportunity for Refiners
Question 17: What are your strategies for managing feed sulfur to reforming units? What are the pros and cons of the different approaches?
STEVENPHILOON (Honeywell UOP)
It is desirable to have a small amount of sulfur in the feed for CCR reforming units in order to reduce the risk of metal catalyzed coke (MCC) formation and heater-tube carburization and dusting. The sulfur interacts with the chromium and the iron to form a protective layer that reduces the penetration of carbon into the metal. However, sulfur is also a poison to the platinum metal function of reforming catalyst; so, the amount in the feed must be kept below the level where it will impact the performance of the catalyst.
The recommended level of sulfur in the feed to a CCR Platforming™ unit varies depending upon the severity of unit operations. The risk of MCC formation increases with decreasing reactor pressure and increasing product octane.
Honeywell UOP’s recommended approach is to operate the naphtha hydrotreating (NHT) unit to remove essentially all of the sulfur in the feed. Thisapproachwill ensure that other contaminants (nitrogen, metals, oxygenates, etc.) are also removed from the feed to the extent achievable by the NHT.Organic sulfur is then added to the Platforming™unit feed with a chemical injection system pumping in a specific and controlled amount of organic sulfur compound to achieve the target recommended by the licensor. This injection of sulfur provides the refiner with independent control of the sulfur in the feed to the unit that can be changed,as needed,if feed rate or operating conditions change
Question 18: The increased production of light straight-run (LSR) from crude units is likely to have an impact on refiners’plans for Tier 3 compliance. What strategies do you employ in order to manage this issue?
JEFF BRAY (Honeywell UOP)
Tier 3 drives hydrotreating of essentially all light naphtha streams. Since most United States refineries have FCCs, it is usually desirable to hydrotreat other gasoline streams more completely to minimize the FCC naphtha olefin saturation and the associated octane loss. Even streams such as alkylate, and butanes can contain sufficient sulfur to impact the pool. Complete hydrotreating of these streams will often require additional hydrotreating capacity. With the increase of light straight-run naphtha yields from crude and the availability of cheap natural gasoline, many sites have become limited in hydrotreating capacity for the gasoline range streams. The regulatory requirement then drives an expansion of hydrotreating, which is very hard to avoid without significant impact on site economics. To make the project add to the site profitability, a key aspect is to try to extend the project not only to just meeting regulatory needs, but also to debottleneck the site so that more material, such as natural gasoline or other condensates, can be upgraded or value added in other ways.